Aisle 9 Celine Cleanup: Hedi Slimane Did Not Take 4-5 Years to Deliver his Vision

Aisle 9 Celine Cleanup: Hedi Slimane Did Not Take 4-5 Years to Deliver his Vision

Aisle 9 Celine Cleanup: Hedi Slimane Did Not Take 4-5 Years to Deliver His Vision

In a recent discussion about why Jonathan Anderson should be given the same 4-5 years to deliver results at Dior, that Hedi Slimane took at Celine, AOC just sighed as we got out the mop and bucket and headed for Aisle 9. “No way,” Anne mumbled as she gave the bucket a good kick in exasperation.

“Hedi Slimane brought almost immediate results to the Celine brand. Why doesn’t Suzie Q check her facts the way we do. We pay $180 a year to read her nonsense. She should stick to recommending lip gloss.”

Committed to facts and knowing that we all make mistakes — including AOC — Anne ran SQ’s “it took a long time at Celine” assertion through AI to confirm our position.

Read More

Aisle 9: Did Maria Grazia Chiuri Actually Leave a 'Mess' at Dior? Gemini Says 'No'

Aisle 9: Did Maria Grazia Chiuri Actually Leave a 'Mess' at Dior? Gemini Says 'No'

Aisle 9: Did Maria Grazia Chiuri Actually Leave a 'Mess' at Dior? Gemini Says 'No'

Suzie Q’s use of the word ‘mess’ to describe Jonathan Anderson’s challenges at Dior, created by former creative director Maria Grazia Chiuri, ran counter to everything I knew about her tenure at the #2 brand at LVMH.

AOC has been really confused by the persistent statements that it could take 4-5 years for Anderson’s Dior vision to codify — including by the designer himself.

Today, we stay focused on that topic. Also Anne clarifies what might be a misunderstanding of what these writers are actually saying, and what she is hearing.

Read More

Aisle 9 Cleanups: Correcting the Record on Gross Errors and Lies About Brands and Business

Aisle 9 Cleanups: Correcting the Record on Gross Errors and Lies About Brands and  Business

Aisle 9 Cleanups: Correcting the Record

We have our first Aisle 9 Cleanups in the queue [1] Hedi Slimane’s timeline creating success at Celine and [2] why it might take as long as five years to “get Dior back on track”.

AI never comes close to writing Anne’s posts. But I do run my core thinking through AI in case it responds “that’s bullpucky”.

Rereading Suzie Q’s posts. I stopped to read a third commentary on the Saks bankruptcy and whether an international VIP should step in to score big for his own stockholders.

Honestly, Suzie Q needs to stay away from financial topics completely. She’s in way over her head.

And her assertion on the MGC mess she left at Dior not only got an AI bullpucky. It came out in all caps. [Okay, I made up the part about the caps.] But it shredded Suzie Q’s assertion with a meat cleaver gone mad. You’ll see.

Read More